Grouped by UEN, Singapore's legal-entity number — two spellings of one employer are one row. Per-employer figures are withheld below 5 postings: one posting's applicant count is not a company's character, and a disclosure rate over three postings says nothing about its policy. "Applications/day" divides each posting's applicant count by how long it had been listed, then takes the median across the employer's postings.
| Employer | Type | Postings | On board now | Applications/day | States pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESPIRE INFOLABS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. | Local Tech | 2 | 0 | —(n=2) | —(n=2) |
| RANDSTAD PTE. LIMITED | Other | 2 | 1 | —(n=2) | —(n=2) |
| U3 INFOTECH PTE. LTD. | Consulting | 2 | 0 | —(n=2) | —(n=2) |
| VANGUARD SOFTWARE PTE. LTD. | Other | 2 | 1 | —(n=2) | —(n=2) |
| ALEPH PTE. LTD. | Local Tech | 1 | 0 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| AMARIS ACT PTE. LTD. | Consulting | 1 | 0 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| ARYAN SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. | Consulting | 1 | 0 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| GECO ASIA PTE. LTD. | Consulting | 1 | 0 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| HELIUS TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD. | Consulting | 1 | 0 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| IKAS INTERNATIONAL (ASIA) PTE. LTD. | Other | 1 | 0 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| NTT SINGAPORE PTE. LTD. | Other | 1 | 1 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| ONE NORTH CONSULTING PTE. LTD. | Consulting | 1 | 1 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| OPTIMUM SOLUTIONS (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD | Consulting | 1 | 0 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| QUESSCORP SINGAPORE PTE. LTD. | MNC | 1 | 1 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| QUESSCORP SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. | Other | 1 | 1 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| VY SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. | Consulting | 1 | 0 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
| WIPRO LIMITED (SINGAPORE BRANCH) | Local Tech | 1 | 1 | —(n=1) | —(n=1) |
Type is derived from the company's SSIC industry code and headcount, not self-declared — read it as a bucket, not a badge.
—(n=14) — listing length needs at least 14 closed postings before a median means anything. Postings have to come down before they can be measured, so this fills in as the site accumulates history.
Of 7 postings on the board, 0.0% have been listed over 60 days (0) and 14.3% have been reposted at least once (1). Signals, not verdicts — a genuinely hard-to-fill role looks the same from outside as a listing nobody intends to close.
Median applications and views per day, by discipline, over the trailing 90 days. Both counters are cumulative totals read at collection time, so they are divided by how long each posting had been listed — otherwise the figure measures how old a posting is rather than how contested. Withheld below 5 postings.
| Discipline | Postings | Applications/day | Views/day | Apply rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontend | 21 | 0.70 | 9.71 | 8.5% |
These are snapshots, not trends. Each collection overwrites the view and application counters, so no history is kept — "applications this week" and "competition over time" are questions this system cannot answer, and nothing here should be read as movement.